下拉刷新

Lding Is Not Supernatural, There Are No Shadow Men. Its Jus

存档 只读
0收藏

回复 163

只看楼主

查看上一页

第 151 楼 ·
classic kid who thinks they know everything about the universe because they researched for 10 minutes. Science only explains the processes behind the experiences, not the experiences themselves. Humble yourself.
第 152 楼 ·
Oh crap, I'm covered in pink feathers and I'm typing with my beak! Cmon man, turn me back
第 153 楼 ·
Keep telling yourself that.
楼主第 154 楼 ·
My input is backed by evidence. If there is no evidence to the contrary, then you are wrong. You are telling me we should believe something with no evidence, that is a bad idea, if you don't have any evidence to support a claim then we must assume you are wrong in your claim.There is no evidence to support LD are shadow men are nothing more then our minds, there is evidence to suggest it is just our minds. Believing in something with no evidence, is nonsense, you suggestion that we assume someone might be right when all evidence suggests otherwise is just plain wrong. We follow the evidence, and the evidence suggests that there are no shadow men and lucid dreams are not spiritual or supernatural in nature.
第 155 楼 ·
Clearly you have no idea what you're talking about.
第 156 楼 ·
I agree, it's entirely possible that there is nothing spiritual, or 'supernatural' going on. However, it's also possible that there is.I think there is probably a lot happening in the world that our five senses can't pick up on, and a lot we don't know. I don't necessarily consider those things to be supernatural...I think they are part of this world and universe but aren't accessible to us.
楼主第 157 楼 ·
You are clearly just bitter.
楼主第 158 楼 ·
Blah blah blah.... no evidence exists that suggest any of this is supernatural in nature. Its just biology, science.
楼主第 159 楼 ·
Nope, I believe you are a flamingo, and thus, you are. Cuz I said so.
第 160 楼 ·
AGAIN just cause we haven't found evidence yet doesn't mean its wrong. All this "evidence" doesn't prove anything, it may point in a direction, but if you can't even see half the problem, you cant answer the question. Im in no way religious and I know we have no proof of god but that doesn't make religious people wrong and me right, we have no idea what happens after death, sure from our eyes its seems there dead and gone. But that doesn't prove there isn't life after death. It just seems like you'll never learn. Have a nice day.
第 161 楼 ·
You are clearly a dime a dozen moron
第 162 楼 ·
My point exactly. Thanks for confirming my suspicions
楼主第 163 楼 ·
If there is no evidence of one thing, and evidence of another, then we must logically go with what the evidence points too. You cant seriously expect a rational adult to believe in something with no evidence... Stating "Just cause we haven't found evidence yet doesn't mean its wrong", is the same thing as stating we have no reason to believe its true, and thus should assume it is wrong. When the evidence points to it not being true, we have to conclude its not true.Your idea that we should believe something with no evidence, is ridicules, you will never learn, you are delusional. One day you will look back on your suggestions that we should believe something hard to believe as it is, with not the slightest shred of evidence, and you are going to feel pretty stupid.
楼主第 164 楼 ·
You sound foolish.