下拉刷新
Apple Says New Macbook Pro Has Only 16Gb Of Ram To Save Bat
存档 只读
Jimmy0517第 61 楼 ·
Don't get their obsession with making everything thinner.
diesel_rider第 62 楼 ·
You wouldn't believe the battery life on my Motorola Razr flip phone. That doesn't mean it's cutting edge.Pun deeeeefintely intended.
TalkingBackAgain第 63 楼 ·
Why not make the new MacBook Pro the thickness of the original first portable Mac and stuff everything not needed for the engineering components full of battery.Sure, it's going to be a lot thicker, it'll weigh more but, fuck me, it'll need recharging once per season!Who's with me?
None第 64 楼 ·
When Marketing department has say over Tech department.
LEMMESMELLDATBOOTY第 65 楼 ·
Nothing about the new MBP justifies the price in regards to hardware. I get that they are stable and reliable as hell, I've been using one for 6 years. I just don't get their pricing.
jimthewanderer第 66 楼 ·
"Apple announces another anti consumer decision"Oh, it must be a day ending in Y again,
Lucidmike78第 67 楼 ·
Apple making all the wrong decisions lately.
None第 68 楼 ·
But then they couldn't claim it was thinner than the last generation.
Kichigai第 69 楼 ·
If battery life was their real concern why did they offer CPU upgrade options? Something tells me the i7 running full-bore slurps up more power than another 16GB of RAM would.
None第 70 楼 ·
It's so cool now that we have all installed ubuntu on our iphones and macbooks!
poochyenarulez第 71 楼 ·
is 16GB not much or something? I don't even get close to using up all my 8GB and I game and photoshop.
DoesNotShitFire第 72 楼 ·
Same, I was hoping for something nice as I believed the MacBook pro was the only thing worth the apple tax. This new revision has not supported that. USB C is cool though.
rivermandan第 73 楼 ·
but it's got two hours less battery life than your 2012! yay progress!
ai_que_preguica第 74 楼 ·
2012 15" Retina was my first MacBook and the way things are going it'll be my last too. Still runs perfectly though
woodhouse17第 75 楼 ·
It's the same amount of ram, but it is a fair bit faster than what is in your 2012. 1600MHz vs 2133MHz
d3monic666第 76 楼 ·
The Gillette macbook, smoothest a man can get
j0phus第 77 楼 ·
Can you imagine if Tesla focused on aesthetic design over function? People reading this comment wouldn't even know what that company does. There is room for both, but you have to remember that you are creating a product to perform a function that people need. You don't keep charging them more and taking away function.Shareholders should be at their wits end with Tim Cook at this point. You can look past one or two mistakes or backlash. You can't have them piling up on top of each other like this with every indication that there is absolutely no vision for the company beyond the next annual meeting.With this kind of leadership, they should completely abandon the car project. That's too complicated and important for the current leadership to manage. You make computers. If they want to focus on other things, break off the divisions into separate companies. Apple makes computers. This sub makes ios devises. This sub focuses on content and services. This sub makes cars.If I were to take over Apple we'd change the vision for the next year and make the #1 priority be 'focus' and we'd buy adderall by the semi.
WolfofAnarchy第 78 楼 ·
OBSERVE AS ALAN WALKS ON STAGE AND SLITS HIS THROAT WITH THE THINNEST MACBOOK WE'VE EVER MADE
None第 79 楼 ·
Well there's an iPad Pro so they sure don't.
DetEndeloseSvart第 80 楼 ·
The words "pro" and "professional" have been so overused and abused by marketing departments everywhere that, at this point, they barely mean anything anyway.
Kwetla第 81 楼 ·
They could literally just not mention the thickness, and nobody would even ask. Just say you've got a full day of battery life, and everyone would throw money at you.
midnitte第 82 楼 ·
Same for phones. I don't need my phone any thinner. It fits in my pocket, I can hold it with my hand. I do need it to last through the day, or even multiple days.
happyscrappy第 83 楼 ·
Jonny Ive is the guy who talks about how thin everything is.I wouldn't like one as thick as the optical drive ones. But I'd be fine with the current (2015 era) thickness continuing. That still should be good for 20 hours I would think.
juan-jdra第 84 楼 ·
I dunno man, thats technology in a nutshell today. For example a thick phone with an amazing battery and specs sounds amazing only to us it seems. Maybe its easer to market smaller and thinner devices than more powerfull ones.
PMaDinaTuttar第 85 楼 ·
Their target demographic is people who should own a chromebook. These aren't pro computers, these are computers for netflix and facebook. They put in what is needed for that, make it as thin as possible and market it as a luxury product for house wives, old people and trustfund kids. This really sucks for us who want a mac as a tool for development.
OTD-Razor第 86 楼 ·
For that you need to go to Microsoft and the new Surface Book. 16 hrs battery life in essentially same form factor as last gen.
GhostalMedia第 87 楼 ·
Designer here.When it comes time to buy a new laptop I ALWAYS hear designers go back and forth over power and portability.A lot of us have gone with the Air because it's nicer to commute with and it's fast enough and many creative apps allow for collapsed pallets now.I'm solidly in the 15in MBP camp, but I work with a lot of people who think I'm crazy, an Air is fine, and it's easier to manage if you're doing a lot of walking / biking to work.
maanu123第 88 楼 ·
Macbook propro
Mintykanesh第 89 楼 ·
Perhaps some kind of pro version?
one-hour-photo第 90 楼 ·
I want a thicker phone and laptop ffa